Researchers find that a cloned cat hardly acts or looks like its “parent.” (Gotta love the name of the second generation kitty….)

The body of Ted Williams, the BoSox slugger, is on ice someplace in Arizona. Why? One guess is that his son hopes that Teddy Baseball can be cloned at some indeterminate time in the future. Too bad that there’s no indication that the clone will be able to hit a curve any better than the son could.

(And what about Walt Disney? What happens when they thaw out old Walt? Will the clock start running again on all those Mickey Mouse copyrights that Congress has been so assiduously protecting?)

Bright story in the NYTimes about inspired penguins in SanFran:

Penguin experts are a bit mystified as to why the arrival of six strong swimmers would prompt 46 other penguins suddenly to spend their days underwater spinning around each other like an errant, tuxedoed rinse cycle.

 

Let me get this straight: Fox is going to test our intelligence? CBS would be one thing, but Fox? The network that brought us “Married with Children” and the Fox News Channel? (Sunday nights is an aberration. What with the “The Simpsons,” someone outside the network must be programming Sundays.)

Could be worse, I suppose. Could be MTV or the WB…

The usually fine AtNewYork newsletter has an odd item today. Seems that AOL’s news server has been screwed up for a week, with the result that Usenet posts from AOL members have not been propagating to the Net. Here’s how they blurbed it:

EXCLUSIVE: A propagation problem which prevented AOL customers from broadcasting messages to the wider USENET community for more than a week has led many customers to question AOL’s much vaunted customer service.

Well, now:

1. Since when has AOL’s customer service been much-vaunted?, and


2. Given the general cluefulness of AOL’s users and their leading role in the deterioration of Usenet, why is this a problem at all?

Anyone want to start a collection to pay the guy who can make this outage permanent?

 

Remember the New York City Council’s bill to ban cell phones in theaters and other public performances? Just wait ’til they hear about this.

A Hong Kong health club chain has banned mobile phones from its locker rooms. Why? Because some new phones come equipped with cameras. Oops.

Think that’s bad? A chain of casinos in Macau is thinking about doing the same thing, for much the same reason. Can’t wait for them to try to pry the phones away from their high rollers…

(By the way, Mayor Bloomberg — to his vast credit — vetoed the cell phone ban today.)

If you’re wondering who to blame for the domestic policies coming out of the Bush administration, you probably already know about Karl Rove and Andy Card. Here’s a name you might not have heard before: Josh Bolten.

A NYTimes profile by Elizabeth Bumiller says Bolten pretty much controls who gets to see the president during the daily 45 minutes alloted to domestic policy. (We’ll leap over for the moment that the White House devotes 45 minutes a day to domestic policy.)

Some interesting facts about Bolten (who was not interested in being interviewed, though his boss — Rove — seemed happy enough to talk):

• He’s not a Texan; he grew up in D.C., where he attended  the exclusive St. Alban’s prep, then Princeton and Stanford Law.


• His dad was in the covert ops wing of the CIA.


• He worked at Goldman Sachs, where he was chief of staff to then-CEO Jon Corzine. Corzine is now a Democratic Senator from New Jersey. Corzine is also is the senator in charge of Democrats’ senatorial campaign committee for the next election cycle.


• He’s Jewish.


• He wears a beard.

Those bullet points make him sound an awful lot like Toby Ziegler.

 

 

Bigfoot, it turns out, was a hoax — the creation of a gent named Ray Wallace. We know because Wallace ‘fessed up. He passed away around Thanksgiving at the age of 84, and his family has come forward.

But here’s the funny part: believers in Bigfoot refuse to believe Wallace’s family, and insist that Bigfoot really does exist.

It’s kind of sad, really. There are people who have devoted their lives to tracking down an elusive creature that now appears to be the product of some wooden foot tracks. Must be hard after all those years to say, “Oops, guess I was wrong. Never mind.”

 

Story in the NYTimes about an author who’s daring to lowercase the “I” in Internet.

About time. I tried to do it seven years ago when I was editor of NetGuide. My theory, like Turow’s, is that we don’t capitalize the commonplace — and that seven years ago, the Net (excuse me, the net) was commonplace. I couldn’t win the argument with the copy desk, which goes to show you the power of copy editors.

One similar fight I did win was at Mobile Office, where I held an issue from going to press until every last hyphen was restored in “e-mail.”

 

One of the fun things about running this weblog is seeing who’s looking for information about what. Don’t worry: I can’t see that Person A is reading Page X. But when people click through to OTE from a Google, Yahoo, MSN, or Ask search, I know what they’d been looking for.

For a long while, someone each day would come around looking for information about a gay porn star named Dred Scott. (Apparently, I used the words “porn” and “star” on the same day I cited the famous Supreme Court ruling.) Lots of people have coming knocking to learn about Mallomars. And in the last week or so, there’s been a ton of inquiries about UPI Pentagon reporter Pam Hess.

But if you want to know what people all over the world were looking for this past year, you’ve gotta check out Google’s Zeitgeist. Way cool. If you can guess who the most searched-for athlete of the year was, you peeked.

 

Ever get a tune into your head that you can’t get rid of? New research shows where in your brain you process music — and why music is such an emotional experience.

It turns out that music isn’t a left-brain or a right-brain functoin. The study, conducted by Dartmouth professor Petr Janata shows that you process music right behind your prefrontal cortex — in the front of your brain, in the center.

ãThis region in the front of the brain where we mapped musical activity,ä says Janata, ãis important for a number of functions, like assimilating information that is important to one’s self, or mediating interactions between emotional and non-emotional information. Our results provide a stronger foundation for explaining the link between music, emotion and the brain.ä